https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220146 The court held that the impugned order is amenable to challenge under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, as it met the criteria for being judicial/quasi-judicial. It was concluded that the Chairman of the Company Law Board (CLB) does not have the power to grant the reliefs prayed for in the Company Application by the Appellant. The court found that the Chairman did not abdicate or fetter his jurisdiction and that the impugned order was neither perverse nor arbitrary. The appeal was dismissed, directing the CLB to commence the hearing of the Company Petition and pass a final order by a specified date. en-us Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:05:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220146 The court held that the impugned order is amenable to challenge under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, as it met the criteria for being judicial/quasi-judicial. It was concluded that the Chairman of the Company Law Board (CLB) does not have the power to grant the reliefs prayed for in the Company Application by the Appellant. The court found that the Chairman did not abdicate or fetter his jurisdiction and that the impugned order was neither perverse nor arbitrary. The appeal was dismissed, directing the CLB to commence the hearing of the Company Petition and pass a final order by a specified date. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220146