<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 227 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220121</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that a company court must advertise a winding-up petition before ordering the winding up of a company. The court emphasized the importance of allowing the company to challenge the advertisement to ensure a fair procedure. The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the winding-up order and remanding the case for further proceedings, directing that any application by the company under Rule 9 should be decided in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 227 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220121</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that a company court must advertise a winding-up petition before ordering the winding up of a company. The court emphasized the importance of allowing the company to challenge the advertisement to ensure a fair procedure. The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the winding-up order and remanding the case for further proceedings, directing that any application by the company under Rule 9 should be decided in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>