<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 224 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application and proceeded with the summary disposal of the appeal after dispensing with pre-deposit. The appeal was dismissed by the appellate Commissioner due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, involving denial of CENVAT credit, interest demand, and penalty imposition. The appellant&#039;s financial hardships were considered, leading to directions for a reduced pre-deposit amount within a specified timeframe. The Tribunal found no strong prima facie case for the appellant but allowed the appeal by remand, instructing the Commissioner (Appeals) to proceed on merits without additional pre-deposit requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 224 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application and proceeded with the summary disposal of the appeal after dispensing with pre-deposit. The appeal was dismissed by the appellate Commissioner due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, involving denial of CENVAT credit, interest demand, and penalty imposition. The appellant&#039;s financial hardships were considered, leading to directions for a reduced pre-deposit amount within a specified timeframe. The Tribunal found no strong prima facie case for the appellant but allowed the appeal by remand, instructing the Commissioner (Appeals) to proceed on merits without additional pre-deposit requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>