<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 218 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220112</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the original authority. The matter was remitted to the original authority for fresh consideration after the production of necessary documentary evidence. The stay petition was also disposed of in light of the decision on the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:03:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 218 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220112</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the original authority. The matter was remitted to the original authority for fresh consideration after the production of necessary documentary evidence. The stay petition was also disposed of in light of the decision on the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>