<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 213 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220107</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the valuation of shares and remanding the matter for reassessment by the Assessing Officer. The Court upheld findings on jurisdiction for assessment under Section 158BC and the validity of the assessment in Coimbatore. The Court also directed that the assessment of shares be limited to those in the names of the assessee and his wife, excluding shares in the names of other relatives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 213 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220107</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the valuation of shares and remanding the matter for reassessment by the Assessing Officer. The Court upheld findings on jurisdiction for assessment under Section 158BC and the validity of the assessment in Coimbatore. The Court also directed that the assessment of shares be limited to those in the names of the assessee and his wife, excluding shares in the names of other relatives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>