<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 207 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee-company for all three assessment years, reversing the orders of the CIT(A). The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid due to the lack of clear demonstration of the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts and the procedural lapse of not providing the reasons for reopening. Consequently, the additions made to the total income on account of sales to JJEL were also invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:02:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 207 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee-company for all three assessment years, reversing the orders of the CIT(A). The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid due to the lack of clear demonstration of the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts and the procedural lapse of not providing the reasons for reopening. Consequently, the additions made to the total income on account of sales to JJEL were also invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>