<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 202 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220096</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Securities Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the appeal was premature as directions from earlier appeals were not implemented. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with refund directives for amounts collected through public issues, extending deadlines for payment and documentation submission. Appellants were instructed to provide Demand Drafts to SEBI, with failure leading to legal actions for recovery. Costs were to be borne by appellants, overseen by Mr. Justice B.N. Agrawal. The Court disposed of all related appeals, emphasizing adherence to previous orders for investor and regulatory protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 202 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220096</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Securities Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the appeal was premature as directions from earlier appeals were not implemented. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with refund directives for amounts collected through public issues, extending deadlines for payment and documentation submission. Appellants were instructed to provide Demand Drafts to SEBI, with failure leading to legal actions for recovery. Costs were to be borne by appellants, overseen by Mr. Justice B.N. Agrawal. The Court disposed of all related appeals, emphasizing adherence to previous orders for investor and regulatory protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>