<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 190 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs.2.50 lakhs within eight weeks and report compliance by a specified date. Upon compliance, the waiver of pre-deposit for the balance amounts was allowed, and recovery stayed pending appeal disposal. The decision balanced the appellant&#039;s arguments with the need for a partial deposit, indicating a lack of strong evidence for a full waiver. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling provided a structured approach by allowing partial relief while ensuring a deposit to proceed with the appeal process. The judgment emphasized the importance of evidentiary support and the need to meet procedural requirements for seeking financial reliefs in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:59:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 190 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs.2.50 lakhs within eight weeks and report compliance by a specified date. Upon compliance, the waiver of pre-deposit for the balance amounts was allowed, and recovery stayed pending appeal disposal. The decision balanced the appellant&#039;s arguments with the need for a partial deposit, indicating a lack of strong evidence for a full waiver. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling provided a structured approach by allowing partial relief while ensuring a deposit to proceed with the appeal process. The judgment emphasized the importance of evidentiary support and the need to meet procedural requirements for seeking financial reliefs in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>