<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 178 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220072</link>
    <description>The court held that interest income earned on Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) pledged as security with departments does not qualify for deduction under Section 80-IB as it does not directly flow from the business activity of the industrial undertaking. The court also rejected the argument for netting interest earned on FDRs against interest paid on bank overdraft, citing relevant Supreme Court precedents. Ultimately, the court dismissed both appeals filed by the Assessee, ruling that there was no substantial question of law to consider.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:58:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 178 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220072</link>
      <description>The court held that interest income earned on Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) pledged as security with departments does not qualify for deduction under Section 80-IB as it does not directly flow from the business activity of the industrial undertaking. The court also rejected the argument for netting interest earned on FDRs against interest paid on bank overdraft, citing relevant Supreme Court precedents. Ultimately, the court dismissed both appeals filed by the Assessee, ruling that there was no substantial question of law to consider.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>