https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220068 The Board concluded that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, the balance of convenience did not lie in their favor, and no irreparable loss would be caused if interim relief was not granted. Consequently, the prayer for ad interim injunction was declined. The case was scheduled for further proceedings with directions for filing replies and rejoinders. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220068 The Board concluded that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, the balance of convenience did not lie in their favor, and no irreparable loss would be caused if interim relief was not granted. Consequently, the prayer for ad interim injunction was declined. The case was scheduled for further proceedings with directions for filing replies and rejoinders. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220068