https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220066 The Tribunal held against the appellant, directing them to pre-deposit the entire amount of interest within six weeks. The appellant's liability to pay interest under Section 11AB on the differential duty was deemed questionable, and compliance was required by a specified date. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not have a prima facie case for waiver and stay based on previous rulings, as subsequent judgments supported the levy of interest in such cases. The appellant's argument of excess CENVAT credit and no intent to evade interest was not accepted, with the Tribunal emphasizing the legal position established by higher court decisions. en-us Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:57:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220066 The Tribunal held against the appellant, directing them to pre-deposit the entire amount of interest within six weeks. The appellant's liability to pay interest under Section 11AB on the differential duty was deemed questionable, and compliance was required by a specified date. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not have a prima facie case for waiver and stay based on previous rulings, as subsequent judgments supported the levy of interest in such cases. The appellant's argument of excess CENVAT credit and no intent to evade interest was not accepted, with the Tribunal emphasizing the legal position established by higher court decisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220066