<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 165 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit for input services used in setting up an ammonia storage tank outside the factory premises. The Tribunal concluded that the services did not qualify for Cenvat Credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, as they were used outside the factory and did not fall within the scope of services related to inputs for manufacturing excisable goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 165 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit for input services used in setting up an ammonia storage tank outside the factory premises. The Tribunal concluded that the services did not qualify for Cenvat Credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, as they were used outside the factory and did not fall within the scope of services related to inputs for manufacturing excisable goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>