<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 163 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220057</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a cooperative society providing training to bank employees, stating that the training services were not taxable under &quot;Commercial Coaching or Training&quot; as defined in the relevant sections. The Tribunal emphasized that the retrospective amendment to the Finance Act, 2010, did not override the term &quot;commercial&quot; and referenced previous decisions where similar training was not considered taxable. The Tribunal granted a stay on the collection of dues and waived the pre-deposit requirement, linking the appeal filed by the Revenue with the appellant&#039;s appeal for final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 163 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220057</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a cooperative society providing training to bank employees, stating that the training services were not taxable under &quot;Commercial Coaching or Training&quot; as defined in the relevant sections. The Tribunal emphasized that the retrospective amendment to the Finance Act, 2010, did not override the term &quot;commercial&quot; and referenced previous decisions where similar training was not considered taxable. The Tribunal granted a stay on the collection of dues and waived the pre-deposit requirement, linking the appeal filed by the Revenue with the appellant&#039;s appeal for final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>