<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 161 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220055</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for waiver of interest under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the petitioner demonstrated genuine hardship as all properties were under attachment and the interest liability was cleared using compensation. The court directed the respondent to reconsider the application within three months, emphasizing proper notice and compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 161 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220055</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for waiver of interest under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the petitioner demonstrated genuine hardship as all properties were under attachment and the interest liability was cleared using compensation. The court directed the respondent to reconsider the application within three months, emphasizing proper notice and compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>