<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 160 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220054</link>
    <description>The court quashed the reassessment notices and consequent proceedings for all three assessment years, ruling that the notices under Section 148 were without jurisdiction. The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid due to the lack of tangible material and failure to meet jurisdictional pre-conditions. The writ petitions were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 160 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220054</link>
      <description>The court quashed the reassessment notices and consequent proceedings for all three assessment years, ruling that the notices under Section 148 were without jurisdiction. The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid due to the lack of tangible material and failure to meet jurisdictional pre-conditions. The writ petitions were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>