<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 156 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s findings that the payments made by the assessee companies to M/s. Hospet Steels Limited were reimbursements and not fees for technical services. Consequently, the assessee companies were not required to deduct tax at source under section 194J of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10 in the cases of M/s. Kalyani Steels Limited and M/s. Mukund Limited were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 156 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s findings that the payments made by the assessee companies to M/s. Hospet Steels Limited were reimbursements and not fees for technical services. Consequently, the assessee companies were not required to deduct tax at source under section 194J of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10 in the cases of M/s. Kalyani Steels Limited and M/s. Mukund Limited were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>