<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220045</link>
    <description>The Gujarat High Court dismissed the petition concerning the legality of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs in not issuing Re-transfer Release Advices for DEPB licenses and the validity of the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade&#039;s cancellation of the licenses. The court ruled that it lacked territorial jurisdiction as the cause of action did not arise within its limits. Consequently, the petition was rejected without delving into the merits of the case, leading to the discharge of the rule and vacation of interim relief. Civil Application No.6127/2000 and Civil Application No.3734/2000 were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220045</link>
      <description>The Gujarat High Court dismissed the petition concerning the legality of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs in not issuing Re-transfer Release Advices for DEPB licenses and the validity of the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade&#039;s cancellation of the licenses. The court ruled that it lacked territorial jurisdiction as the cause of action did not arise within its limits. Consequently, the petition was rejected without delving into the merits of the case, leading to the discharge of the rule and vacation of interim relief. Civil Application No.6127/2000 and Civil Application No.3734/2000 were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>