<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 136 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220030</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that the tax component included in the tariff for the sale of electricity should be considered part of the sale price for relief under Section 80IA/80IB. Additionally, the notional tax reimbursement for Unit VII was deemed eligible for relief under Section 80IA. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside, and the tax case appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 136 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220030</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that the tax component included in the tariff for the sale of electricity should be considered part of the sale price for relief under Section 80IA/80IB. Additionally, the notional tax reimbursement for Unit VII was deemed eligible for relief under Section 80IA. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside, and the tax case appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>