<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 133 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals and cross-objection, remanding the cash credit issue for fresh examination. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s 8% net profit estimation and confirmed the deletion of penal charges as allowable business expenditures. The Tribunal criticized the AO and CIT(A) for not thoroughly examining the creditworthiness of cash credits and deemed the estimation of net profit at 8% reasonable given the unreliable books of account and comparative cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 133 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals and cross-objection, remanding the cash credit issue for fresh examination. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s 8% net profit estimation and confirmed the deletion of penal charges as allowable business expenditures. The Tribunal criticized the AO and CIT(A) for not thoroughly examining the creditworthiness of cash credits and deemed the estimation of net profit at 8% reasonable given the unreliable books of account and comparative cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>