<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 116 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220010</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s interest claim on a refund was rejected by lower authorities. The Tribunal decided in 2007 that interest was payable to the appellant. Despite the refund being sanctioned in 2008, interest was not paid within three months as per a higher judicial forum&#039;s decision. The first appellate authority rejected the interest claim, but the judge ruled in favor of the appellant, citing settled law and previous court judgments. The judge emphasized the appellant&#039;s eligibility for interest on refunds after three months from the claim filing date, in line with statutory provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 09:08:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 116 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220010</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s interest claim on a refund was rejected by lower authorities. The Tribunal decided in 2007 that interest was payable to the appellant. Despite the refund being sanctioned in 2008, interest was not paid within three months as per a higher judicial forum&#039;s decision. The first appellate authority rejected the interest claim, but the judge ruled in favor of the appellant, citing settled law and previous court judgments. The judge emphasized the appellant&#039;s eligibility for interest on refunds after three months from the claim filing date, in line with statutory provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>