<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 108 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220002</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals of the assessee and dismissed all appeals of the Revenue. The additions for alleged repayment of loans and interest were deleted, and penalties under Sections 271D and 271E were canceled. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s presumptions lacked corroborative evidence and ruled penalties unjustified due to lack of proof of cash transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 09:07:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 108 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220002</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals of the assessee and dismissed all appeals of the Revenue. The additions for alleged repayment of loans and interest were deleted, and penalties under Sections 271D and 271E were canceled. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s presumptions lacked corroborative evidence and ruled penalties unjustified due to lack of proof of cash transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>