<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 105 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, confirming that Broken Period Interest (BPI) paid on the purchase of securities should be treated as revenue expenditure. Additionally, BPI paid in earlier years should not be disallowed in the current assessment year. The adjustments on valuation of securities were dismissed as they were deemed consequential to the favorable decisions on the first two issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 105 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, confirming that Broken Period Interest (BPI) paid on the purchase of securities should be treated as revenue expenditure. Additionally, BPI paid in earlier years should not be disallowed in the current assessment year. The adjustments on valuation of securities were dismissed as they were deemed consequential to the favorable decisions on the first two issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>