https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219997 Section 42 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act confers exclusive seisin on the court where the first application under Part I is filed, so later applications arising from the same arbitration agreement must be presented there. The earlier application concerning the same dispute was the first in point of time, and the jurisdiction clause also supported exclusive jurisdiction at New Delhi, with the record showing relevant performance and escrow links there. On that basis, the later Section 9 application before another court could not be entertained and was held to be barred by Section 42. en-us Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219997 Section 42 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act confers exclusive seisin on the court where the first application under Part I is filed, so later applications arising from the same arbitration agreement must be presented there. The earlier application concerning the same dispute was the first in point of time, and the jurisdiction clause also supported exclusive jurisdiction at New Delhi, with the record showing relevant performance and escrow links there. On that basis, the later Section 9 application before another court could not be entertained and was held to be barred by Section 42. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219997