<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 93 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219987</link>
    <description>The judge allowed the appeals, setting aside the first appellate authority&#039;s rejection of refund claims. The judge emphasized the importance of adhering to legal principles and precedents, noting that the first appellate authority incorrectly relied on its own earlier order, which had been overturned by the Tribunal. The decision underscores the significance of consistency and adherence to legal decisions in ensuring fair outcomes in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 93 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219987</link>
      <description>The judge allowed the appeals, setting aside the first appellate authority&#039;s rejection of refund claims. The judge emphasized the importance of adhering to legal principles and precedents, noting that the first appellate authority incorrectly relied on its own earlier order, which had been overturned by the Tribunal. The decision underscores the significance of consistency and adherence to legal decisions in ensuring fair outcomes in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>