<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 86 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219980</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with several issues remanded back to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for re-examination and others dismissed based on legal precedents and statutory provisions. The Tribunal upheld certain adjustments while directing reconsideration on specific issues, ultimately emphasizing the application of relevant laws and precedents in determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for the transactions in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 86 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219980</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with several issues remanded back to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for re-examination and others dismissed based on legal precedents and statutory provisions. The Tribunal upheld certain adjustments while directing reconsideration on specific issues, ultimately emphasizing the application of relevant laws and precedents in determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for the transactions in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>