https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219969 The tribunal remanded the case involving allegations of fraudulent credit availed based on fake invoices to the original adjudicating authority. The impugned order denying credit due to non-existent manufacturing premises was set aside, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of the respondent's submissions and adherence to legal principles. The matter was remanded for a fresh review, focusing on verifying the existence of supporting manufacturers and ensuring compliance with statutory requirements for cenvat credit on yarn. Both the appeal and cross-objection were disposed of in light of the remand decision. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219969 The tribunal remanded the case involving allegations of fraudulent credit availed based on fake invoices to the original adjudicating authority. The impugned order denying credit due to non-existent manufacturing premises was set aside, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of the respondent's submissions and adherence to legal principles. The matter was remanded for a fresh review, focusing on verifying the existence of supporting manufacturers and ensuring compliance with statutory requirements for cenvat credit on yarn. Both the appeal and cross-objection were disposed of in light of the remand decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219969