https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219960 The court dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose that would warrant interference with the authorities' conclusions. The appellant's arguments regarding the legality of the authorities' actions, consideration of evidence, opportunity for cross-examination, obligation to explain the source of funds, applicability of relevant tax provisions, adverse inferences, and overall legality of the orders were all decided against the appellant. The court upheld the findings of the authorities below and dismissed the appeal. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:05:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219960 The court dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose that would warrant interference with the authorities' conclusions. The appellant's arguments regarding the legality of the authorities' actions, consideration of evidence, opportunity for cross-examination, obligation to explain the source of funds, applicability of relevant tax provisions, adverse inferences, and overall legality of the orders were all decided against the appellant. The court upheld the findings of the authorities below and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219960