https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219949 Leave to appeal against acquittal in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution was considered under Section 378(4) CrPC. The complainant had to show compelling circumstances or perversity to justify interference with the acquittal. The court noted that the trial court had found serious doubt about the alleged loan transaction, including the complainant's failure to establish financial capacity to advance the loan. As the materials did not disclose illegality, perversity, or other substantial reason for appellate interference, special leave to appeal was refused. en-us Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219949 Leave to appeal against acquittal in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution was considered under Section 378(4) CrPC. The complainant had to show compelling circumstances or perversity to justify interference with the acquittal. The court noted that the trial court had found serious doubt about the alleged loan transaction, including the complainant's failure to establish financial capacity to advance the loan. As the materials did not disclose illegality, perversity, or other substantial reason for appellate interference, special leave to appeal was refused. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219949