<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 54 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219948</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision to allow the company to secure the claim with a bank guarantee in a case involving a failed joint venture agreement and a winding-up petition due to payment defaults. The appeal challenging relegation to a suit without a bona fide defense was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of securing claims to prevent winding-up petitions by unsecured creditors. The court found the exercise of discretion by the learned Judge appropriate and declined to interfere, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal with an unconditional stay of operation for a month and no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 54 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219948</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision to allow the company to secure the claim with a bank guarantee in a case involving a failed joint venture agreement and a winding-up petition due to payment defaults. The appeal challenging relegation to a suit without a bona fide defense was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of securing claims to prevent winding-up petitions by unsecured creditors. The court found the exercise of discretion by the learned Judge appropriate and declined to interfere, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal with an unconditional stay of operation for a month and no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>