<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 49 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219943</link>
    <description>The judge set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the first appellate authority for reconsideration, emphasizing the need to follow principles of natural justice and apex court directions on condonation of delay. The appeal was reinstated for review on its merits, stressing the importance of deciding matters based on legal principles rather than technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:10:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 49 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219943</link>
      <description>The judge set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the first appellate authority for reconsideration, emphasizing the need to follow principles of natural justice and apex court directions on condonation of delay. The appeal was reinstated for review on its merits, stressing the importance of deciding matters based on legal principles rather than technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>