<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 42 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219936</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the deemed dividend addition to Rs. 34,858. The case clarified the interpretation of accumulated profits for calculating deemed dividends, emphasizing the distinction between loan transactions and capital adjustments. The judgment underscored that deemed dividends should only be to the extent of accumulated profits, as specified under section 2(22)(e) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 42 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219936</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the deemed dividend addition to Rs. 34,858. The case clarified the interpretation of accumulated profits for calculating deemed dividends, emphasizing the distinction between loan transactions and capital adjustments. The judgment underscored that deemed dividends should only be to the extent of accumulated profits, as specified under section 2(22)(e) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>