<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 40 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219934</link>
    <description>The Court held that the stitching charges received by the textile business were not eligible for Section 10B exemption as they did not qualify as domestic sales under the second proviso to Section 10B. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the exemption was overturned, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of the charges under &#039;other sources&#039; was upheld. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 40 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219934</link>
      <description>The Court held that the stitching charges received by the textile business were not eligible for Section 10B exemption as they did not qualify as domestic sales under the second proviso to Section 10B. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the exemption was overturned, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of the charges under &#039;other sources&#039; was upheld. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>