<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 39 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219933</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, allowing the appeals against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The subsidy received for commissioning the Co-Generation Power Plant was held to be deducted from the cost of assets for depreciation calculation, in accordance with Explanation 10 of Section 43(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision clarified the correct treatment of subsidies in asset valuation and depreciation calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:09:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 39 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219933</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, allowing the appeals against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The subsidy received for commissioning the Co-Generation Power Plant was held to be deducted from the cost of assets for depreciation calculation, in accordance with Explanation 10 of Section 43(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision clarified the correct treatment of subsidies in asset valuation and depreciation calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>