<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 37 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by directing the AO to re-compute deduction under section 10A, excluding uncredited remittances from export turnover. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the claim for depreciation on plant and machinery, as the subsidy received was deemed general and not specific to any asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:09:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 37 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by directing the AO to re-compute deduction under section 10A, excluding uncredited remittances from export turnover. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the claim for depreciation on plant and machinery, as the subsidy received was deemed general and not specific to any asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>