<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 33 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219927</link>
    <description>The Madras HC recorded that a Custom House Agent whose licence was suspended under Regulation 20(2) of the CHALR, 2004 is entitled to seek revocation of the suspension and pursue the statutory remedy in accordance with law. The Court did not adjudicate the merits of the suspension in the writ petition and disposed of the matter on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 33 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219927</link>
      <description>The Madras HC recorded that a Custom House Agent whose licence was suspended under Regulation 20(2) of the CHALR, 2004 is entitled to seek revocation of the suspension and pursue the statutory remedy in accordance with law. The Court did not adjudicate the merits of the suspension in the writ petition and disposed of the matter on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>