<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 28 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that herbal shampoos, even with ayurvedic ingredients, are to be classified under Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff. The impugned order was set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 28 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that herbal shampoos, even with ayurvedic ingredients, are to be classified under Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff. The impugned order was set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>