https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219919 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a service provider, stating that they were not engaged in the transfer of the right to use goods and therefore not required to register as a 'dealer' under the TVAT Act. The letter mandating registration was overturned, and the respondents were prohibited from taking any action based on it. The writ petition was granted, and each party was instructed to cover their own expenses. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219919 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a service provider, stating that they were not engaged in the transfer of the right to use goods and therefore not required to register as a 'dealer' under the TVAT Act. The letter mandating registration was overturned, and the respondents were prohibited from taking any action based on it. The writ petition was granted, and each party was instructed to cover their own expenses. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219919