https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219915 The court affirmed the trial court's decision, dismissing the appeal and upholding the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 by preponderance of possibilities, presenting evidence that the cheque was intended for a finance company, not the complainant. Discrepancies in the complainant's evidence and the accused's actions supported her defense, leading to the acquittal based on the lack of proof of a legally enforceable debt. en-us Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:54:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219915 The court affirmed the trial court's decision, dismissing the appeal and upholding the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 by preponderance of possibilities, presenting evidence that the cheque was intended for a finance company, not the complainant. Discrepancies in the complainant's evidence and the accused's actions supported her defense, leading to the acquittal based on the lack of proof of a legally enforceable debt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219915