<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 11 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219905</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, classifying income from the sale of shares as business income rather than capital gains. The decision was based on the high volume, frequency, and systematic nature of the transactions, indicating business activities. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not considered relevant facts and reinstated the assessing officer&#039;s classification of the income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 11 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219905</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, classifying income from the sale of shares as business income rather than capital gains. The decision was based on the high volume, frequency, and systematic nature of the transactions, indicating business activities. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not considered relevant facts and reinstated the assessing officer&#039;s classification of the income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>