<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 9 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed that an adjudicating authority be appointed and the matter be adjudicated within one month after due notice to the appellant. It further required compliance to be reported on the specified date, ensuring prompt completion of the adjudication process and observance of procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:53:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 9 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed that an adjudicating authority be appointed and the matter be adjudicated within one month after due notice to the appellant. It further required compliance to be reported on the specified date, ensuring prompt completion of the adjudication process and observance of procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>