<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 3 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219897</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay applications and the appeals as time-barred due to a delay of 2649 days in filing the appeals. The appellants&#039; pursuit of a writ petition in the High Court was not considered a valid reason for the delay, and their blameworthy conduct in choosing alternative remedies over the statutory appellate route led to the dismissal. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of timely pursuing statutory remedies and rejected the appellants&#039; argument that the delay was technical, ultimately underscoring the consequences of significant delays in seeking relief under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 3 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219897</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay applications and the appeals as time-barred due to a delay of 2649 days in filing the appeals. The appellants&#039; pursuit of a writ petition in the High Court was not considered a valid reason for the delay, and their blameworthy conduct in choosing alternative remedies over the statutory appellate route led to the dismissal. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of timely pursuing statutory remedies and rejected the appellants&#039; argument that the delay was technical, ultimately underscoring the consequences of significant delays in seeking relief under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>