https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219894 SC held the delay in filing the first appeal was not so excessive as to warrant dismissal on technical grounds, finding the appellant was not callous or negligent. The Court declined to decide merits, set aside the impugned orders, and remitted the matter to the Executing Court to consider and dispose of the objections under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC on merits and in accordance with law, granting the appellant an opportunity to lead evidence and prosecute the matter substantively. en-us Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Aug 2025 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219894 SC held the delay in filing the first appeal was not so excessive as to warrant dismissal on technical grounds, finding the appellant was not callous or negligent. The Court declined to decide merits, set aside the impugned orders, and remitted the matter to the Executing Court to consider and dispose of the objections under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC on merits and in accordance with law, granting the appellant an opportunity to lead evidence and prosecute the matter substantively. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219894