https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219893 The court held that the seizure of 'Betonin AST Tonic' was illegal as the Revenue failed to properly classify the product for tax purposes. The Revisional Authority's decision to tax the tonic at 13.5% was overturned, directing the Commissioner of Taxes to use the common parlance and scientific tests for classification within six weeks. Until then, VAT on the product should not exceed 5%. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the seizure order and allowing the revision petition without costs. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219893 The court held that the seizure of 'Betonin AST Tonic' was illegal as the Revenue failed to properly classify the product for tax purposes. The Revisional Authority's decision to tax the tonic at 13.5% was overturned, directing the Commissioner of Taxes to use the common parlance and scientific tests for classification within six weeks. Until then, VAT on the product should not exceed 5%. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the seizure order and allowing the revision petition without costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219893