<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 907 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219892</link>
    <description>Road repair services were treated as exempt from service tax with retrospective effect under Section 143 of the Finance Act, 2012, so the demand could not be sustained. On that basis, the pre-deposit requirement was waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal. The impugned order was set aside and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 907 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219892</link>
      <description>Road repair services were treated as exempt from service tax with retrospective effect under Section 143 of the Finance Act, 2012, so the demand could not be sustained. On that basis, the pre-deposit requirement was waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal. The impugned order was set aside and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>