<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 871 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219856</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of expenses under section 14A, directing the AO to recompute the disallowance on a reasonable basis. Additionally, the ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant on the treatment of loans as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e), deleting the deemed dividend addition. The judgments were based on the interpretation of legal provisions and precedents, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellant in both issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 06:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 871 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219856</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of expenses under section 14A, directing the AO to recompute the disallowance on a reasonable basis. Additionally, the ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant on the treatment of loans as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e), deleting the deemed dividend addition. The judgments were based on the interpretation of legal provisions and precedents, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellant in both issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>