https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219846 Preventive detention was invalid where the detaining authority had merely reproduced the sponsoring authority's proposal with only cosmetic changes, because subjective satisfaction must be based on grounds independently formulated after application of mind. The comparison showed the grounds of detention were substantially verbatim to the proposal, and the authority's denial was vague and unconvincing. That mechanical adoption defeated the constitutional safeguards governing preventive detention, so the detention order was vitiated for non-application of mind and could not be sustained; the detenu was directed to be released. en-us Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219846 Preventive detention was invalid where the detaining authority had merely reproduced the sponsoring authority's proposal with only cosmetic changes, because subjective satisfaction must be based on grounds independently formulated after application of mind. The comparison showed the grounds of detention were substantially verbatim to the proposal, and the authority's denial was vague and unconvincing. That mechanical adoption defeated the constitutional safeguards governing preventive detention, so the detention order was vitiated for non-application of mind and could not be sustained; the detenu was directed to be released. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219846