<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 859 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219844</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, to dispense with meetings of equity shareholders and creditors for approving the Scheme of Amalgamation. All shareholders, including the Transferee Company and its nominee, consented in writing to the Scheme. As the Transferor Company had no creditors, the court decided to waive the meetings based on shareholder consent and absence of creditors, emphasizing the importance of shareholder approval and financial status in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 06:35:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 859 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219844</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, to dispense with meetings of equity shareholders and creditors for approving the Scheme of Amalgamation. All shareholders, including the Transferee Company and its nominee, consented in writing to the Scheme. As the Transferor Company had no creditors, the court decided to waive the meetings based on shareholder consent and absence of creditors, emphasizing the importance of shareholder approval and financial status in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>