<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 853 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219838</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed Appeals No. E/675, 1190 &amp;amp; 1182/09-Mum and allowed Appeal No. E/1060/09-Mum in toto. It set aside duty demands and corresponding interest orders but upheld demands for incorrect CENVAT Credit availment on aggregates used captively, with interest recovery. Penalties were reduced, and reversal of CENVAT Credit on advertisement services was confirmed with interest recovery but without penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 853 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219838</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed Appeals No. E/675, 1190 &amp;amp; 1182/09-Mum and allowed Appeal No. E/1060/09-Mum in toto. It set aside duty demands and corresponding interest orders but upheld demands for incorrect CENVAT Credit availment on aggregates used captively, with interest recovery. Penalties were reduced, and reversal of CENVAT Credit on advertisement services was confirmed with interest recovery but without penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>