<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 851 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219836</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner was entitled to a hearing opportunity before the imposition of penalties under Section 40(2) of the TNVAT Act, emphasizing principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. The court set aside the assessment orders and remitted the matter to the assessing authority for reconsideration with a hearing opportunity provided to the petitioner. The court allowed the writ petitions without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 851 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219836</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner was entitled to a hearing opportunity before the imposition of penalties under Section 40(2) of the TNVAT Act, emphasizing principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. The court set aside the assessment orders and remitted the matter to the assessing authority for reconsideration with a hearing opportunity provided to the petitioner. The court allowed the writ petitions without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>