https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219835 The court upheld the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, finding the petitioner liable to pay service tax under the category of "Business Auxiliary Service." The court declined to interfere with the order, emphasizing that the petitioner should pursue the alternative remedy of appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. The judgment highlighted the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 and the importance of following the statutory appeal process in challenging administrative orders. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs. en-us Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2014 12:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219835 The court upheld the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, finding the petitioner liable to pay service tax under the category of "Business Auxiliary Service." The court declined to interfere with the order, emphasizing that the petitioner should pursue the alternative remedy of appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. The judgment highlighted the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 and the importance of following the statutory appeal process in challenging administrative orders. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219835